<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>LINICKX.com</title><link>https://www.linickx.com/</link><description></description><lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2012 19:37:00 +0100</lastBuildDate><item><title>Disappointed by google drive</title><link>https://www.linickx.com/disappointed-by-google-drive</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm a (&lt;em&gt;very happy&lt;/em&gt;) google apps user and when &lt;a href="http://drive.google.com"&gt;google
drive&lt;/a&gt; was announced a while back I was looking
forward to giving it a spin.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Well I have taken 5min's out of my life to test out the &lt;em&gt;google's doc's
on my desktop app&lt;/em&gt; only to be quite disappointed; what google have done
is taken the worst part of the market leader's
(&lt;a href="http://dropbox.com"&gt;dropbox&lt;/a&gt;) cloud storage app, married it to the
worst part of google docs and pushed it out!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;!--more--&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The worst part of dropbox is the reason for it's success - sync'in files
to different machines, now stay with me... I'm a big dropbox user and
I've got about 8Gbs of storage with them and I love the app. The issue
with the system is that when I link my dropbox account to a new machine
it downloads my whole 8Gbs of data, do I need the same 8Gb on every
machine, no... I want some of dropbox's other features (&lt;em&gt;cloud-backup,
versions, undelete, sharing&lt;/em&gt;) associated with that data, yes! What would
be nice is to be able to "tag" folders with a "sync to all machines"
(&lt;em&gt;or similar&lt;/em&gt;) but I reckon I'll be waiting a log time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The worst part of google drive (&lt;em&gt;docs&lt;/em&gt;) is the "lock in", do I want to
use google-docs to view all my files, no! I have some very good apps
which work just fine locally. Do I want to be able to
edit/view/download/share some of my files hassle free from "another
machine", yes!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You see, I have a use case for both dropbox &amp;amp; google docs and I was
really hoping that google drive was going to marry up the two, but
instead what did I get.... a system tray app which fills up my hard
drive with shortcuts!!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;What google should have done...&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The system tray app should not create anything locally, what it should
do is mount my google drive as if it was a local drive! I could then
copy/paste/move files in and out of my google drive as if it was part of
my local system; when I'm at work/pub/friends/somewhere I can fire up a
web browser and edit/view/download those files. If I then load up the
system tray app on another machine with the drive-mounting approach
there is no need to sync Gbs of data and I can just get started on the
few files I'm interested in at that point in time. (&lt;em&gt;I respect that some
caching/syncing would be required to create a good user experience.&lt;/em&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is my rant over, google, I hope you fix it ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nick</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2012 19:37:00 +0100</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:www.linickx.com,2012-07-01:disappointed-by-google-drive</guid><category>Blog</category><category>Google</category><category>google drive</category><category>rant</category></item><item><title>Talking to me, GoogleTalk &amp; MSN</title><link>https://www.linickx.com/talking-to-me-googletalk-msn</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've tried this before and binned it due to the mess MSN creates on your
googletalk contact list, but here I am again re-connecting my MSN
Buddies to GoogleTalk...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.bigblueball.com/forums/general-other-im-news/33739-connect-google-talk-aim-msn-yahoo.html"&gt;Connect Google Talk to AIM, MSN, &amp;amp; Yahoo - BigBlueBall
Forums&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 Now that Google has opened up their Google Talk servers for
federation with other Jabber servers, you can use Google Talk to
connect to your friends on AIM, MSN, Yahoo or ICQ.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don't like MSN, the client is clunky, full of adverts communication is
insecure, blah blah blah; so I stopped using it daily (&lt;em&gt;i.e. singing
automatically&lt;/em&gt;) a couple of years back, but my stubbornness of asking my
friends to switch to googletalk or skype has only back-fired, in some
cases I have even lost touch with people, this is complete madness since
some my "buddies" even have gmail e-mail accounts!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I really wish that MSN,AIM,ICQ,GoogleTalk and everything else would
implement a "gateway to gateway" standard, the idea of having to create
gmail accounts or hotmail accounts to send e-mails to specific buddies
is considered madness so why isn't there an implemented "SMTP" for chat,
google have obviously started the ball rolling by using XAMPP as their
standard but why won't the others play ball?? Come on guys sort it
out!!!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:25:00 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:www.linickx.com,2008-02-25:talking-to-me-googletalk-msn</guid><category>Blog</category><category>chat</category><category>googletalk</category><category>internet</category><category>msn</category><category>rant</category></item><item><title>Nice Banner !</title><link>https://www.linickx.com/nice-banner</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've never really been happy with the banner on my site, but to be
honest I've never settled on anything good, so I've stuck to the &lt;a href="https://www.linickx.com/blog/wp-content/themes/linickx_v2/images/background-header.png"&gt;plain
blue
thingy&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Over the last couple of day's I've come across a couple of nice ones....&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;style type='text/css'&gt;
#gallery-1 {
  margin: auto;
}
#gallery-1 .gallery-item {
  float: left;
  margin-top: 10px;
  text-align: center;
  width: 33%;
}
#gallery-1 img {
  border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;
}
#gallery-1 .gallery-caption {
  margin-left: 0;
}
/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
&lt;/style&gt;
&lt;div id='gallery-1' class='gallery galleryid-205 gallery-columns-3 gallery-size-thumbnail'&gt;&lt;dl class='gallery-item'&gt;
&lt;dt class='gallery-icon '&gt;
  &lt;a href='https://www.linickx.com/205/nice-banner/cshields-personalheader'&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.linickx.com/files/2008/10/cshields-personalheader-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="http://staff.osuosl.org/~cshields" aria-describedby="gallery-1-544" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/dt&gt;
  &lt;dd class='wp-caption-text gallery-caption' id='gallery-1-544'&gt;
  http://staff.osuosl.org/~cshields
  &lt;/dd&gt;&lt;/dl&gt;&lt;dl class='gallery-item'&gt;
&lt;dt class='gallery-icon '&gt;
  &lt;a href='https://www.linickx.com/205/nice-banner/crypt-header'&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.linickx.com/files/2008/10/crypt-header-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="http://www.crypt.gen.nz" aria-describedby="gallery-1-545" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/dt&gt;
  &lt;dd class='wp-caption-text gallery-caption' id='gallery-1-545'&gt;
  http://www.crypt.gen.nz
  &lt;/dd&gt;&lt;/dl&gt;
&lt;br style='clear: both' /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;p&gt;as you can see my tastes are very different; but I like both idea's very
much. I've always wanted to include &lt;a href="http://art.gnome.org/users/linickx/backgrounds/"&gt;my more successful
GnomeArts&lt;/a&gt; in my
website theme somewhere but never managed it... humm back to the drawing
board thinks I ;-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 17:07:00 +0100</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:www.linickx.com,2006-06-21:nice-banner</guid><category>Blog</category><category>rant</category><category>web design</category></item></channel></rss>