<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>LINICKX.com</title><link>https://www.linickx.com/</link><description></description><lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 21:40:00 +0100</lastBuildDate><item><title>Is Mac the Anti-Linux or the Answer?</title><link>https://www.linickx.com/is-mac-the-anti-linux-or-the-answer</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So, I've been toying with the idea of buying a mac. Using WindowsXP is a
no go for me, we're just not friends; work haven't yet rolled out Vista.
I love linux, have been using it for years, and have upset many an I.T
department by partitioning their loving-crafted standard Windows Build
with my favourite flavour of linux but I'm getting the same old
Gripes....&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hardware-Compatibility:&lt;/strong&gt; Now don't get me wrong, fedora has installed
and pretty-much worked out of the box for years, but it's the little
niggles that get you, my hp nc6320 (&lt;em&gt;company issued&lt;/em&gt;) has an intel
wireless card, and quite frankly the fedora support is unreliable; if
it's not issues where by I can't connect to hidden ssids, I can't run
leap, and even my broadcasted home wpa network can be a bit flakey (&lt;em&gt;my
n800 &amp;amp; ps3 use it fine so it's definitely a laptop issue&lt;/em&gt;).... top this
off with the odd issue with graphics cards, very little support for
mobile broadband, fingerpint authentication and it's enough to drive
anyone mad!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Work-Compatibility:&lt;/strong&gt; Like most UK companies EVERYTHING has a windows
focus, even down to the linux web-managed-appliances which have to be
ie7 compatible. Open-office is great, but I can't run the macro's
written by our marketing department (&lt;em&gt;which format things&lt;/em&gt;) and even if
I do manually make it look right the conversion to MS-Word is a bit
"iffy". Evolutions exchange-connector works most of the time, but
archiving my mailbox from outlook screws it, changing my password (&lt;em&gt;due
to expiry&lt;/em&gt;) cause mail-notification to freak-out, and the built-in html
formatting engine doesn't set a font so if I reply to an HTML e-mail,
all my text is in the nasty times roman.. and just another couple of
points since I'm in full rant, share-point support in firefox! and what
is everyone's obsession is MSN and office communicator, what's wrong
with skype or google talk both of which have platform independent
solutions. (&lt;em&gt;Yes pidgin supports MSN, but it's not feature complete&lt;/em&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;So is a mac the answer?&lt;/strong&gt; Those I've known an met whom own macs (and
in the UK, unless you're in media they're few and far between) have all
said "everything just works"... oh how I've longed for that... and the
UI is nice, so all the compiz prettyness that I've gotten used to is
kinda there. I've done some research, there's an offical office for mac,
which support exchange, there's a communicator for LCS which includes
msn support, there's certianly more off the shelf software that supports
mac than linux!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;But is it out of the frying pan into the fire?&lt;/strong&gt; Let's look at why XP
doesn't work for me, 1stly the interface, it makes me feel
unconfortable, I've tried themeing it, but that just covers up the bad
colour scheme, themes ocasionally slow your machine down, some apps
don't accept the theme engine, and after-all you're just painting a bad
egg so even if it is easier on the eye the problems sill exist! All this
aside, Vista is supposed to address the usability and eye-candy issues,
so maybe I should be using that? So user-interfaces could be considered
a shallow reason to choose your OS, and to be honest although how I
interact with the PC is important (&lt;em&gt;since it's what I do for a living&lt;/em&gt;)
it's not what attracted me to linux in the 1st place. FREE, yes FREE is
what attracts most of us to linux, windows licencing and cost is a
nightmare, winzip &amp;amp; winrar are examples of stuff you expect to have as
part of the OS, yes XP can open .zips but what about .tgz? ... OK lets
look at terminal emulation or ssh, finding a good one can be a problem
putty is great but it's a bit dis-jointed, the sftp function isn't built
into explorer tab's is an extra add-on... what about the stuff you
occasionaly use, so I re-size the odd image or convert .jpg to .png
should I be paying for a tool I only use once a month, if I should, can
I afford it?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The investment in a mac is not a small one, so my question is, &lt;strong&gt;can I
get the best of both world&lt;/strong&gt;s? Can I buy the software I need, and
download open-source alternative easily for the rest? Can I mix the "it
just works" with the tech-tinkering that I'm used to? After purchasing a
macbook, ms office for mac, vmware-fusion (&lt;em&gt;I have vm-ware server on
linux to run visio, I know this will be no-different on a mac&lt;/em&gt;) and
topped that off with a backup-solution (&lt;em&gt;work pay to backup windows,
rsync does the job for linux&lt;/em&gt;) I'm going to have spent best part of
£1,500... oh yeah this includes a special VGA cable so I can plug into a
projector... apple are known for tying users in tightly, will that
become my new bug-bear? which leads me to....&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Is Mac the Anti-Linux?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Apple insist that their OS runs only on their hardware, the ipod only
works with their software (&lt;em&gt;itunes&lt;/em&gt;) and plays their music format, you
need special cables to plug your laptop into a standard
monitor/projector, the iphone only works with apples chosen provider...
is all this restriction going to make things worse? Linux is about
freedom, machine architectures range from pda's to playstations, the
interface that you use can easily be changed, nearly everything is open
and if I were a programmer I could fix, change, anything I liked....
would I be jumping from complete democratic freedom to a dictatorship?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;So there we have it, a million questions I just don't know the answer
to!&lt;/strong&gt; I do know I don't have a grand kicking about, so this won't be
something I tackle lightly, if I do I then have the politics at work to
address, no booting into linux isn't supported by IT, but the laptop is
a standard-same-as-everyone-else-thingy if I bring in a shiny new apple
it's going to attract attention.... which will certainly upset someone!
The windows of change are bring more macs to the UK, but is it just a
fad? More thought is definitely needed, I just hope I can bring myself
to a decision soon :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 21:40:00 +0100</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:www.linickx.com,2008-04-29:is-mac-the-anti-linux-or-the-answer</guid><category>apple</category><category>Blog</category><category>Linux</category><category>mac</category><category>questions</category></item></channel></rss>